May 23, 2025, 6:43 p.m.

Not a shrine, but a symbol of manipulation: chaplain about Transfiguration Cathedral in Odesa

(Photo: Intent)

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate is flourishing in Ukraine thanks to government support.

Father Oleksandr Smerechynsky, a well-known naval chaplain in Odesa, a confessor of the local Euromaidan and deputy head of the Department of Maritime Apostolate of the UGCC, said this for the Intensive.

"There was a huge state support. We remember how the Transfiguration Cathedral was built. Another interesting point is how much they worried about the destruction of the historical monument. But this is not a historical monument, it was completed in 2010, if I'm not mistaken. Of course, the fact that the missile hit it is blasphemy and shouldn't be so. But there is also manipulation here: they say that the "shrine of Odesa" was destroyed. This is not the shrine of Odesa, it is the shrine of a separate church," he said.

The chaplain believes that instead of pressure and repressive measures, a much more effective approach to overcoming the dominance of the structures of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate in Ukraine would be to introduce equal conditions for all religious organizations. In his opinion, it is necessary not to support any of the denominations, but to give them the opportunity to operate in the same legal and economic field. In an environment of religious competition, he argues, the advantage naturally goes to those who truly have the trust of the community.

He is convinced that the UOC-MP would not disappear under such conditions, but its influence would be significantly reduced. As an example, Smerechynsky cites the situation with pro-Russian organizations in Odesa before 2014, which were active thanks to external funding. After this support was cut off, their influence came to naught.

Oleksandr Smerechynskyi expresses his belief that some of the clergy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate deliberately maintain ties with Moscow, or at least do not break with this influence, well aware of the benefits they receive in the current environment. He suggests that some members of the clergy do not move to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine not because of ideological beliefs, but for reasons of preserving influence, status and material opportunities that they are unlikely to be able to reproduce in another jurisdiction.

According to the chaplain, excessively harsh pressure from the state or the public on structures associated with the MPs can have the opposite effect. Instead of weakening the organization, such actions contribute to its internal cohesion. In addition, it allows individual clergymen to shape the image of "martyrs" around them, which further strengthens their authority among the faithful.

Smerechynsky also notes that despite the formal lack of support for the UOC-MP at the national level, in some regions, particularly in Odesa, this support from local authorities is maintained, allowing the church structure to continue to hold its ground.

Naval chaplain Oleksandr Smerechynsky drew attention to the transformations in the positioning of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate after 2014. According to him, before the war began, the names of churches clearly indicated affiliation with the Moscow Patriarchate - this inscription was placed in large letters, while the name "Ukrainian Orthodox Church" was in much smaller print. However, after the beginning of Russian aggression, the situation changed - the signs were replaced, and the mention of the Moscow Patriarchate disappeared.

The chaplain believes that this change was not accidental, but rather an attempt to preserve the influence of the religious structure by avoiding direct association with the Russian religious center. He also suggests that some of the clergy and believers are sincerely convinced of the truthfulness of their own position. At the same time, he does not rule out that there are those among the church's leadership and clergy who deliberately manipulate the facts in an attempt to disguise their true ties to Moscow.

Ірина Глухова

You might also like:

May 20, 2025

OCU priest accuses authorities of discriminating against IDPs from Crimea

May 22, 2025

In Odesa region, only 5 communities have joined the OCU, the rest are Russian churches

May 23, 2025

Decommunization in Odesa led to physical confrontation

May 22, 2025

Monuments in Odesa treated with anti-vandal solution: what is now protected

May 21, 2025

Pro-Russian museum in occupied Crimea is under EU sanctions

May 22, 2025

EU punishes museum worker from occupied Crimea for supporting Russian army

May 20, 2025

An artist from Odesa region organized an exhibition at the Lviv Media Forum

May 19, 2025

Book on the destruction of a Russian cruiser near Crimea presented in Kyiv

May 10, 2025

Ukraine is preparing to liquidate Russian churches that have not joined the OCU

May 18, 2025

A memorial plaque to Pushkin was smashed in Odesa

May 22, 2025

Fugitive MP from Odesa has been working for Russians for three years, but has not lost his mandate

May 19, 2025

Mykolaiv is among the top ten most transparent cities, and Odesa is ranked 34th

May 17, 2025

Ukrainian Armed Forces eliminate Russian priest who robbed houses in Kherson region

May 21, 2025

Intent.Insight on the defense of the South in Kherson region

May 19, 2025

Two days in a row of fighting in Odesa over the dismantling of a memorial plaque in a park